Today's Japanese bureaucracy challenge: can I convince NTT to activate my FTTH VoIP service (which I only need on an IPv6 deployment technicality) *without* sending me any equipment? Failing that, can I make sure they don't try to replace my ONU with a combi unit?
-
-
UPDATE: they finally called me (I assume they're understaffed for obvious reasons) and the lady was perfectly happy when I told her I was going to use it with a smartphone app, and my router is already compatible with the service (lie). So it seems they're sending nothing \o/
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yes, I'm definitely getting only a /64 RA on my existing IPoE contract and DHCPV6 returns no prefixes available.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Why do you need a /56? (Here in italy we are locked on ipv4 only)
-
Because I have more than one subnet and IPv6 ISPs giving out only a /64 is ridiculous and against RFC recommendations.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Ugh, I really dislike how ISPs don't do proper RA. It's 2020, get it together!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
a major US ISP somewhat-undocumentedly accepts DHCPv6 prefix length hints to get residential customers up to a /60. do they not have something like that?
-
I'm pretty sure I tried /60 and nope.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.