ffmpeg developer: "Using <extremely common use case> is invalid to prove anything." Why do I even waste my time on this?https://twitter.com/BMahol/status/1255867904475750401 …
-
Show this thread
-
If I can hear artifacts in a single encode, it's all in my head and I'm a crazy audiophile loonie (and so is everyone else complaining). If I do a subtraction test, that's invalid for psychoacoustic codecs. If I do repeated transcodes, that doesn't prove anything. I'm out.
5 replies 2 retweets 42 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @marcan42
Makes me wonder if it'd be possible to have some kind of metadata that aligns the block positions as to match the source file
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @Phredreeke
It's the same source file, with the same alignment. It still completely murders the audio after just 4 generations at 128k.
8:13 AM - 30 Apr 2020
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.