If I can hear artifacts in a single encode, it's all in my head and I'm a crazy audiophile loonie (and so is everyone else complaining). If I do a subtraction test, that's invalid for psychoacoustic codecs. If I do repeated transcodes, that doesn't prove anything. I'm out.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Just to be clear, he's referencing this thread where I provided all the info requested with a testcase (but he replied to the wrong thread).https://twitter.com/marcan42/status/1255778661942231040?s=19 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, waste of time for sure.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
it's a shame fdk_aac is the only decent aac encoder (given its license), but now that we have opus I don't really care anymore :p
-
Try streaming Opus to Twitch (or any other RTMP service), let me know how that works :-)
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Their opus encoder/decoder is also really shit with extremely noticeable artifacts and they refuse to do anything about it; ffmpeg: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/458063291822899212/705700633914769408/n07_dnm_kk_urban__ffmpeg.mp3 … xiph's libopus: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/458063291822899212/705700643637297152/n07_dnm_kk_urban__xiph.mp3 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.