at this point you could implement a VM for something sane in PIC assembly and just switch to programming that
Tbh, I think the entirety of the PIC24/dsPIC33/PIC32 market is literally engineers who learned on PIC16/18 and can't or won't learn anything else, who Microchip managed to dupe into thinking their other lines are more familiar than an ARM would be, because they're called PICs.
-
-
Heck that's why *I* tried dsPIC once. I just saw all the bullshit and ran far far away after that one attempt.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The project I was briefly involved with was using a dsPIC for literally this reason
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’d agree with that. It’s not even like the I/O structures are that similar; no 5V tolerance on a lot of them. There was a brief window while there were no 5V tolerant ARM chips at reasonable price but even that’s gone.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They have a very large educational presence as well. Very much the MATLAB of microcontrollers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
My comment was more for the thread as a whole rather than directly in response to your point about dsPIC. You’re right.