|----------------| | STOP | | USING | | MICROCHIP | | PICS | | IN | | INTERNET | | CONNECTED | | DEVICES | | | | OK | |----------------| (\__/) || (•ㅅ•) || / づ
-
-
I have a question based on a lack of experience. I started with PIC's & we found for low frequency audio, the PIC could generate a pretty decent waveform for what we needed (sorry forgot the hz) When we tried this with the arduino's, It didn't go so well. Has this changed?
-
When I say it didn't go well, I mean it was a horrible approximation of a sine wave from the arduino, and the PIC did it fairly adequately.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Literally no metric? Power consumption, DIP availability, analog peripheral selection, cross-platform vendor-supported tooling, interrupt latency, code density, ease of programming, pin remappability, short-run factory programming, code-gen tools, low-cost debuggers...
-
Any progression that AVR had made on these fronts is on the coattails of the Microchip acquisition. I'm by no means a PIC apologist, but they have their place, and I've definitely used them sporadically through the years.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Same! I switched to STM32, but yes.
-
TBH it was quite easy to get free samples for all models, which probably helped many people to get started with these chips. I dont think I ever paid for any PIC microcontroller I used, in fact :D
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Annoyingly, in Uni, we were taught to program specific programs in op code for PICs. This was... 5 years ago? Bit more? Not at all representative of industry.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.