Yes, there is. Because a true AI is not something you "train" and then "use" just like a human is not something you "train" and then "use". A true AI is something that has to *live, experience, and learn on its own*.
Yes, but now you're using mathematical equivalence arguments which are not useful. Yes, you can theoretically write a Brainfuck program to solve machine translation too (and AI and everything else). That's not a useful thing to say.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The point is that ML approaches used today, used the way they're intended to be used, aren't going to solve AI and MT, because they can't do that without embedding a completely new approach into them that would make the entire ML part pointless.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.