You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Do I won't argue with you. Code in Rust, it's an option, but coding in Rust makes you dependant of an OS, of a kernel, of libraries, full of security breaches. When I code in assembly language, usually for embedded systems, 100% of the code is my own code. I use no library.
If you had actually looked into Rust, you'd know it works standalone without an OS, a kernel, or anything but a tiny subset of the standard library, which is itself written in Rust and thus largely free of security flaws by design. Rust works fine on embedded systems.
Great for those who don't have my skills in assembly language.
Great for those who want to write maintainable and safe code efficiently. You do you, but I still won't hire you. You're not superhuman, your assembly has exploitable bugs. The only way to write safe code is to use tools that reduce the chances of mistakes.
You tend to say that there are no expert and experienced coders in assembly language that lnow many tricks (coding conventions and specific constraints), but there are. Okay, we're not so many, but we exist. PS : I have nothing against Rust.
What you said is good to know. But don't spit on those who have the skills and long experience to do it manually in assembly language, with very specific coding constraints.
It doesn't matter how specific your constraints are. Humans make mistakes and violate constraints. By delegating those constraints to the compiler, which only needs to have those constraints encoded once and then apply to all software, you improve the overall code quality.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
