So, the problem with USB tokens that we basically have two choices: - Unauditable black boxes built on *supposedly* more secure ICs that require NDAs to develop for - Open and auditable, but definitely pwnable off the shelf microcontrollers. Which poison do you prefer?
Oh, the crypto stuff isn't documented, it's only usable with a binary blob. Fail.
-
-
Interesting, the ARM page for the cryptocell 312 says that "All of the CryptoCell-312 components are provided in source code format.". At this point, I'm not sure why Google chose to use that Nordic board for their OpenSK project instead of a more open platform...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Upon closer inspection though, looks like they don't provide any kind of physical protection against glitching and stuff like that... Puzzling. I feel your frustration.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.