It's hardware-based emulation via FPGA(s), which as I understand it is different from (and has the potential to be more accurate than) software-based emulation and is one of the reasons why it's more expensive. Not sure how record or live worthy it will ultimately be though.
-
-
(I'm actually interested in this and some kind of collab with a chiptuner to try to get extremely accurate characterization of some platform's audio is the kind of project that'd be right up my alley)
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It's possible, by definition. Given enough processing power and analysis it's always possible to make an accurate model. I could be wrong, but I'd wager that there isn't anything magic in GB sound that makes it infeasible to accurately replicate with your average CPU.
- Show replies
-
-
-
according to their marketing literature it's "not designed using software emulation"... which I'm assuming is at least for its CPU core. if that logic were to also apply to the actual audio output stage, i don't think it'd be as simple as having a "transparent DAC" […]
-
[…] especially since the various GB versions have drastically different audio quality between each other (in addition to supporting their respective upgraded platforms like GBC/GBA extensions of course). so unless they're sticking different […]
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
