How lighting conditions can induce a different per-frame exposure time in a camera and cause a stroboscopic + rolling shutter effect, well visualized by this gif [source: https://buff.ly/2X5Oo0i ]pic.twitter.com/PBvMnPyKyx
-
-
Replying to @Rainmaker1973 @NickGarnettBBC
Is that partly due to reflection/ refraction of light ?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
It's mainly due to the sampling rate of the camera: it's frame rate changes according to lighting conditions, so in the fist case you don't see the so called rolling shutter effect, while in the second case you get it, with that particular "strobo" result
1 reply 1 retweet 18 likes -
Replying to @Rainmaker1973 @NickGarnettBBC
Ah I see yes that makes sense now. More light faster frame rate
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @WalktheTalk999 @WalkTheTalk18 and
But wait, the frame rate doesn't change. That's set by the video format. But the exposure time does. With more light, the camera adjusts a quicker exposure time. In the first case, each frame of the ruler is blurry. With more light, quicker exposure, not blurry. Right?
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @DanielAHedges @WalkTheTalk18 and
Yes exactly, common confusion between frame rate and shutter speed. When the light gets brighter the camera adjusts to a faster shutter speed, thus freezing each frame and revealing the rolling shutter effect that was previously hidden by motion blur.
3 replies 0 retweets 16 likes
Worth noting that the frame rate *can* change. Once the lighting gets dark enough that the shutter speed is slower than the frame rate, the frame rate drops too. Either the file ends up with duplicate frames, or missing ones (modern video formats support variable frame rates).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.