Color me impressed with Ghidra. Just stuff like this alone is worth it over IDA. No more fumbling over getting function prototype syntax just right to IDA's liking.pic.twitter.com/MQfprAfOuK
Show this thread
-
-
I like that the decompiler calls x86 INT 'swi(x)'. You can tell what architecture they were thinking about when they did that...pic.twitter.com/Nq3hdD5Dce
1 reply 3 retweets 23 likesShow this thread -
Okay, this *desperately* needs IDA's 'highlight everything that matches whatever the cursor is over' thing though. If this isn't implemented (and I just haven't found it yet), this is the very first feature I'd add.pic.twitter.com/dWi6Lsr3Hz
3 replies 3 retweets 20 likesShow this thread -
Ah, you can *manually* trigger it to do backwards or forwards data flow analysis, which is really cool. But I still kind of would rather it do a dumb text match by default without any additional clicks.pic.twitter.com/XbRdgX3NaW
1 reply 3 retweets 12 likesShow this thread -
You can map them to hotkeys though. I could get used to this workflow, but it's too strict (e.g. doesn't work for globals). I just want a dumb "highlight all the same symbol/text" thing...
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @Mario_Vilas
The whole thing is a pile of plugins, so yes.
11:23 PM - 5 Mar 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.