I could be wrong but I thought the issue is they are relabeling old tech in with the new tech to be the same number 3.2 which could lead to false advertising and isn't consumer friendly.
-
As I replied to your other tweet thanks for explaining a part of it. However this tweet here is a fallacy. And just because a new technology is made to to be compatible with an old doesn't mean it should be relabeled as the new one and if that's not happening,thatswhatpeoplethink
But as I said there's no relabeling. A new speed was added, so that means a new version of the standard. The standard isn't some standalone thing, it's literally just an update to the prior standard, so it retains all the existing options.
-
-
Literally all the commotion is over a little note from USB-IF telling implementors that the speeds specified in the various versions are the same (duh) and then telling them that, in marketing, they should use the speed names (not versions!) to avoid confusion.
-
Everyone making noise over this hasn't even bothered to read the actual standards and what they require or don't of devices. It's much ado about nothing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.