You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I feel like the complaint is primarily about hosts, and the perception that a company could take a computer equipped with a 3.1 chipset and with zero modifications slap a 3.2 sticker on it, even though it could never achieve more than the 3.1 it was allotted.
Is anyone actually doing that? I've looked at the 3.2 spec and I can't find a hard requirement for hosts, though it *does* say that *hubs* have to support all speeds. USB 2.0 *did* require hosts to support 480mbps. This could be an oversight in the spec.
I honestly have no idea! But apparently, at the least, some people think they are, or could. At least, that was the sense that I got from the Ars article.
The author of the article just had a back-and-forth with me on twitter but he didn't produce any examples of *hosts*, just of devices, so I dunno...
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
