You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Look, if you're complaining that not all USB 3.2 devices can do 20Gbps, I hope you also complain that not all 802.11ac devices can do 3.6Gbps, or that not all HDMI 1.4 devices can do 4Kp24, or that not all LTE networks will give you 1Gbps down.
This is how standards work. The standard defines the maximum capabilities, which not all devices need to implement. The standard *may* define some minimum capabilities for *certain* devices, like USB 2.0 requires hubs and hosts to support 480mbps (but not devices).
Given my experience with USB devices, you should be damn happy if a USB3.2 device gets 5Gbps...
I would be happy if I could find a single FOSS 802.11ac device pair that could do 3.6Gbps. :-)
USB 3.2 is, I think, unique amongst those in that the name communicates zero information. Most USB 3.2 devices will be literally identical to USB 3.0 devices.
I could be wrong but I thought the issue is they are relabeling old tech in with the new tech to be the same number 3.2 which could lead to false advertising and isn't consumer friendly.
This is how every other standard I listed works, and how USB 2.0 worked. New standards *improve* old standards, but do not *exclude* them.
What, you mean this USB3.2 hard drive enclosure won't speed up the 5400RPM drive I put in it?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
