Unicode = a standard. Specific software = *implementations* of Unicode. Totally fine for implementation developers to say "we choose to not support rendering certain character combinations." Problem solved!
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Let's say you special-case disable
+ ⃠ =
⃠ . Then what about
+ ⃝ + ⃥ =
⃝⃥ ? Or
⃫⃥ ?
This is an endless slippery slope. Unicode is vast, someone will always be able to come up with a hateful combination of codepoints. We can't fix people with software.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
"If it's not perfect, it's not effective" is a false premise China's 'great firewall' isn't 100% perfect; one can get around it with niche VPNs. But it's a chore, so the vast majority of people don't bother. That's enough to ensure >95% of netizens see nothing about 1989-06-04
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
China's 'great firewall' is a totalitarian control device and has many, many false positives and side effects. I'm sorry, but if you're going to use the GFW to argue for attempting to control hate via font rendering hacks, you've already lost the argument.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I dislike it, as much as you seem to, because it's an effective device. If you want to follow your own exhortation to think about people, rather than software, you could think and read about *why* it's effective.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's effective at a *massive cost*. It is not a good example for how we should be approaching the fact that someone discovered one more way to express hate on the Internet. How is banning a two-codepoint combination going to significantly solve homophobia?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Not sure why you think a simple list of do-not-render sequences entails “massive cost.” See the Pinterest example via
@zeynep in my earlier tweet Her book has a solid intro on how affordances of social technologies shape behaviour. This is not new stuff—reading it will help
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It won't work, because the trolls who would actually use this maliciously *love* a technical challenge, and any time someone comes up with a new offensive sequence everyone can just copy and paste it trivially. This is like word filters. They don't work.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.