Hot take: if you think Apple should get rid of the "anti-gay emoji" (a technical feature of Unicode, not an explicit thing), you should also get rid of images, as they can be used for the same purpose. And text altogether. This is a people problem, not a technology problem. https://twitter.com/HeyItsShuga/status/1098041971459928065 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
There is no technological solution for hate. Hate is horrible, but we can't fix it by adding special cases to font rendering algorithms. Those who wish to spread hate will do so regardless.
4 replies 15 retweets 96 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @marcan42
Yeah, it's not like the Unicode consortium added a swastika. Platforms can try to filter as harassment, maybe, but just because 8===D is a dick doesn't mean you delete the letter D. That being said, the frustration is understandable, but there's not a clean solution here.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @hedgeberg @marcan42
This is the problem with the nature of tech. As long as you have character joiners (a needed thing, if not great), the no-sign (a useful character), and diverse emojis that help people express their identity (a really good thing), this will be possible.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hedgeberg
Heck Unicode *does* have ࿕ and it's perfectly fine because it has non-hateful reasons to be there (it means completely different things in other cultures). It also has an actual 𓂸, because it's an Egyptian hieroglyph.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @marcan42 @hedgeberg
Now if Unicode had a swastika set at 45° (that wasn't the result of a generic feature to rotate characters), *that's* when I'd start being worried, because as far as I can tell that is quite strictly a Nazi thing. Intent matters, and this stuff is subtle.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @marcan42
Yes and no. You have to be careful with that, a lot of cultures disowned the image of the non-inverted swastika post-wwII because the inverted swastika had tainted it's meaning. There are some words/symbols where intent doesn't matter, the meaning is clear or has changed.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @hedgeberg @marcan42
Either way, arguably the inverted and non-inverted glyphs are different glyphs, but if someone is posting Nazi imagery, or imagery that is meant to intimidate or scare a group (like the no-gay unicombo), moderation/filtering may be warranted, and its something Twitter lacks.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Honestly I think it's a *good* thing if hateful people latch onto things like the no-gay unicombo. Like, that's a hell of a lot easier to moderate technologically (at a higher layer) than images.
-
-
Replying to @marcan42
Oh for sure. It's an easy filter that people (ideally) won't aim neural nets at. Gives you a fast indicator of character. That being said, Twitter won't do it. They dont do any proactive manual moderation. That's a problem for us, but it's politically convenient for them.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.