I don't get all the controversy over Huawei code having backdoors. Has anyone *looked*? I have. It's a humongous pile of buggy NIH. It doesn't *need* backdoors. It's guaranteed to have exploitable bugs. The Chinese govt just needs the source to find them faster than adversaries.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @marcan42
Adrienne Arsenault. So why is evidence so hard to come by? Give me one motive for Huawei to ruin its integrity and marketing area. Unlike the US bugging Angela Merkel. Bottom line, Huawei 5G is cheaper, faster and ready now which is what we want.
#cdnpoli1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jksellors
Huawei isn't deliberately ruining anything. They just have (very) buggy software. You don't need "motive" to write poor software, you just need to be cheap and have poor development practices. Bottom line, Huawei stuff is dangerous because it is *poor quality*, not backdoors.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marcan42
I heated the opposite. Huawei 5G is more advanced and very fast. It will put Canada at a competitive advantage over the US. Canada should build it’s own independent network connected to the internet via a new arctic fibre running through the North West Passage.
#cdnpoli1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jksellors
Huawei stuff is buggy *precisely* because it's advanced without the engineering quality to back it. Yes they make cheap stuff that supports leading edge technologies. It just happens to be buggy and insecure. Is having a vulnerable "advanced and fast" network worth it?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Look, this is like a car with a monster engine, a massive sound system, and no seatbelts, ABS, or any other safety technologies. Yes, it will get you to your destination faster, and you'll have a lot of fun listening to music along the way, but when you crash you're dead.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.