I don't get all the controversy over Huawei code having backdoors. Has anyone *looked*? I have. It's a humongous pile of buggy NIH. It doesn't *need* backdoors. It's guaranteed to have exploitable bugs. The Chinese govt just needs the source to find them faster than adversaries.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @marcan42
Adrienne Arsenault. So why is evidence so hard to come by? Give me one motive for Huawei to ruin its integrity and marketing area. Unlike the US bugging Angela Merkel. Bottom line, Huawei 5G is cheaper, faster and ready now which is what we want.
#cdnpoli1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jksellors
Huawei isn't deliberately ruining anything. They just have (very) buggy software. You don't need "motive" to write poor software, you just need to be cheap and have poor development practices. Bottom line, Huawei stuff is dangerous because it is *poor quality*, not backdoors.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marcan42
Stephen Harper: during a visit to China 2012, then PM Stephen Harper said he was “honoured” to have witnessed the signing of large contracts for Huawei to provide Telus and Bell with the latest LTE high-speed wireless networks across Canada. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/chinese-firm-s-canadian-contracts-raise-security-fears-1.115728 …
#cdnpoli1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Call me when Stephen Harper is an engineer who has worked with and audited Huawei devices.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.