I'm following all people involved in tech.
RT this if that's your background, I want to see more positive things on my TL
-
-
Replying to @Lando2Good
If you have an interest in controlling the hardware that you own, I'd keep an eye on
@Puri_sm (some of their@coreboot_org-related blogposts are very interesting), and@RaptorEng/@RaptorCompSys who develop/sell#OpenPOWER hardware. For people,@tekwendell@marcan42@justinrwlynn1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @olddellian @Lando2Good and
Just watch out for
@Puri_sm 's tendency to over-exaggerate the owner controllability of their hardware. Many of their products require some form of Intel ME or have other owner-hostile characteristics.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @RaptorCompSys @olddellian and
Indeed. I wish
@puri_sm the best when it comes to making the best of a less than ideal position with generally excellent engineering but they do have a tendency to over exaggerate their solution to those fundamental design flaws. A soft foundation makes for a shakey skyscraper.1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @justinrwlynn @RaptorCompSys and
Yeah,
@Puri_sm do good work, but they are unfortunately held back by their goal of wanting to get FSF "Respects your Freedom" certification (which does anything but). I've ranted about this on Twitter before. They are having to engineer horrible anti-user hacks to meet it.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @marcan42 @justinrwlynn and
On a more positive note, a couple of times I've basically said "nobody does open X", someone said "
@RaptorEng do" and@RaptorEng immediately followed up with a Git repo link. <31 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @marcan42 @justinrwlynn and
Sigh...over-exaggerating is a nice way to say false advertisement. They will /never/ be able to deliver a libreboot machine, and the first machines they shipped delivered on none of their promises. They admittedly do a great job with UI and education for secure computing.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @RobertSpigler @marcan42 and
They're working on a dead platform, I wish they'd see that. They have to reverse engineer each gen. of CPU to partially free it of IntelME (which they'll then advertise as fully free), so the machines will always be years behind. And with Blackbird's out, they're not cheaper.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
I was mostly thinking of their phone, which has a decent chance of getting close to fully free (as far as the AP goes anyway) but the way they're dealing with the remaining blobs is deliberately *anti-freedom* because that's what RYF certification requires.
-
-
Replying to @marcan42 @RobertSpigler and
Basically the FSF says if you make blobs invisible, immutable, un-auditable, and therefore un-freeable then they might as well not exist by their definition, which is hilariously backwards - I want all my blobs in /lib/firmware where I can see them and mess with them.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @marcan42 @RobertSpigler and
Keep your source close, but your blobs closer?
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.