I write down my passwords.. encrypted.. in a password manager.. I sure as hell don't want anything sensitive stored in plaintext on my hdd even if the hdd is encrypted!
-
-
Which is fine, *if* you type in your password every time you use it. Which is not what most people want with an IM app. If you just keep the password manager active forever without requiring master password re-entry, the net benefit of its encryption is ~zero.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
What's the target demographic for Signal? People who don't care about security? Why would they even use it in the first place? If it shits on security, it fails at being useful.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Make Signal require the password every time you open the window and watch the userbase disappear. And then you still get pwned by a keylogger anyway. Seriously. Wrong solution. If you want app isolation, get the damn OS to do app isolation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Just make it optional and let the user decide their level of paranoia.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
And then you're still insecure against rogue apps running simultaneously with Signal anyway. So the users think they're more secure, but they mostly aren't. You can add crappy half-assed protections into Signal, or you can do it right and get the OS to do it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It would be a lot more secure against for example a girlfriend opening Signal while I'm in the kitchen and reading my old messages because there's no way I'm locking my computer so she can't use it to watch youtube.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Why doesn't your girlfriend use a different user? Seriously, this is entirely the wrong way to try to solve that problem.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
My point is that you don't know people's use cases and threats. I don't have Signal on my desktop computer. If I had a girlfriend it would be completely unreasonable to close youtube and log out to go to the kitchen so that she could log into her account and play another video.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You should try modern operating systems, they let you log in as two different users at the same time. What *is* completely unreasonable is for every app to implement invariably broken, half-assed lockouts in case someone wants to stop their girlfriend from using that app.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Anyway, I'm tired of arguing here. The OP implying Signal is doing something wrong by not sprinkling extra encryption on local storage on a desktop OS is dumb. If you want shitty broken "protections", find someone who *isn't* well versed in solid security to write them for you.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.