Ah, I see, Bloomberg. So instead of a (partial) retraction of your at least half if not fully bullshit China implant story, you're going to now publish *one guy's* claim of Ethernet jack implants. When you had <5 days to check anything he provided.
-
Show this thread
-
Remember when a certain other security researcher was convinced his Ethernet jacks had implants? Remember all this "evidence"? How *we* knew it was BS? Now consider whether Bloomberg's technically clueless journalists would know it's BS.
3 replies 12 retweets 53 likesShow this thread -
Seriously, this is just pathetic now. They just went from "1 year and multiple sources" to "<5 days and one guy". This is just negligence. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-10-09/new-evidence-of-hacked-supermicro-hardware-found-in-u-s-telecom …
5 replies 31 retweets 78 likesShow this thread -
Why is it that every time something like this happens nobody has any hard documentation or analysis results? Ah yes, the best cop-out. "We don't have it any more, we can't give you more details".pic.twitter.com/EooD0aIVyR
4 replies 11 retweets 47 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @marcan42
..because it's so hard to take a photo. lack of a photo is slam-dunk on the Bloomberg article being bullshit. I hope Supermicro sues them.
1 reply 2 retweets 10 likes
I mean, at least this article doesn't have a *fabricated* photoshoot like the last one did.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.