Ah, I see, Bloomberg. So instead of a (partial) retraction of your at least half if not fully bullshit China implant story, you're going to now publish *one guy's* claim of Ethernet jack implants. When you had <5 days to check anything he provided.
-
Show this thread
-
Remember when a certain other security researcher was convinced his Ethernet jacks had implants? Remember all this "evidence"? How *we* knew it was BS? Now consider whether Bloomberg's technically clueless journalists would know it's BS.
3 replies 12 retweets 53 likesShow this thread -
Seriously, this is just pathetic now. They just went from "1 year and multiple sources" to "<5 days and one guy". This is just negligence. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-10-09/new-evidence-of-hacked-supermicro-hardware-found-in-u-s-telecom …
5 replies 31 retweets 78 likesShow this thread -
Why is it that every time something like this happens nobody has any hard documentation or analysis results? Ah yes, the best cop-out. "We don't have it any more, we can't give you more details".pic.twitter.com/EooD0aIVyR
4 replies 11 retweets 47 likesShow this thread -
So now we have *software* detecting *analog* stuff like the "power consumption" of a *network*. None of those words go together. At all.pic.twitter.com/h0W0R8cI7L
6 replies 7 retweets 71 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @marcan42
The article seems to suggest that the implants had their own MAC addresses and/or were assigned their own IP.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Especially on the BMC shared Ethernet port which works exactly like that *by design*.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.