I read the CoC and thought “who can disagree with that?” Then I read you link and I see the disagreement is not about the CoC but about a manifesto written by the same person. They can’t criticize the CoC, so they have to resort to this.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
The funny thing is all of these people go on about "meritocracy", yet they resort to digging up stuff on a person in order to criticize them. I don't remotely agree with everything Coraline says either, but her contribution here is the CoC, and it's Just Fine.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
She isn't pushing anything into Linux; Linus committed that into the kernel tree himself. If you believe in the code and the commits, as everyone seems to love to claim, then you'll judge the CoC on its own merits, not whatever else the author has written.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Have you read the CoC? It's pretty much "don't be a dick" in a few more words. And regardless of what you think about the underlying politics, you're being a dick by calling Coraline a "he".
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I don't care what the author of the document intends; I care about the words on the page, and the words are entirely reasonable. Calling you a dick is no more disrespectful than you deliberately misgendering someone.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
You call it suspension of belief, I call it being nice to people (with a dash of scientific backing). If you think that's a religion, you might want to look up "religion" in the dictionary.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.