this thread contains quite a bit of heavy bullshit it talks about how Rust is too complex to learn-by-doing (and that even the official _book_ on it isn't enough to understand the language) as if that's a _good thing_https://twitter.com/AndreaPessino/status/1042120425415700480 …
The issue with Rust is that it's arguably harder to learn as an experienced programmer. Like he says, I'm used to skimming the guide/examples and jumping right in to writing complex code in $newlanguage. That doesn't work with Rust.
-
-
Simple examples are easy, and my first Rust program was actually a moderately complex socket proxy/mux thing which wasn't too hard to write. But now I'm trying to design a key-value store abstraction layer for a large project in Rust and still haven't figured out the lifetimes.
-
Jumping in the deep end is fine with most other languages, but it hurts more with Rust. Then again, it's not like I've tried, say, Haskell.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.