You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
This video is mesmerizing. At first you think it's clever, then you think it's fake, then you look closer and realize it's mostly real. It's fun figuring out how they did it.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMQRJYxPPCs …
There are some deceptive bits and some hidden things, but other than some touch-ups for artistic purposes I don't think video editing/CGI was involved much, and most of the effects shown really are or could be a result of drawing the conductive ink traces.
E.g. some/all of the batteries are dummies, the voltage is way too low for what they're doing, but if you look closely you can see how things are powered from the rear. And some things that look connected aren't if you look closely.
Which I think is the strongest proof that, really, it's all real. After all, if you were just going to fake it, why go through the trouble of using all these subtle but visible tricks to make the circuits carefully functional?
Isn't the long delay between established ink "contact" and actual reaction (light or motor motion) the most obvious hint that it's fake? The objects/scenes look perfectly legit though, just cheating with how it's powdered.
What if I told you the ink decreases in resistance as it dries?pic.twitter.com/eLmB40jcmn
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
