Holy shit, Breitbart has amazing SEO. Google ignores all of your search terms and returns them in second place instead.pic.twitter.com/9BIvGFDWnV
Show this thread
-
Forgot to address the "desireable" part. A better example wwould be something under question like nuclear vs solar/wind power. How would google decide what kind of pages are more desirable to show for people? I personally don't want google to become the arbiter of "truth"
But they aren't "deciding". They use signals. Sometimes those signals align with an individual's views, sometimes they don't. What we definitely don't want is some kind of dictated "equal representation" nonsense criteria to make results "fair".
-
-
For example, it's logical and desirable that Google results should favor true statements. Fact checkers have established that, statistically, Republicans lie more than Democrats. Therefore, if Google favors truth, it would *implicitly* favor Democrats, not due to any bias per se.
-
How exactly would google know if a claim is true? Who checks the fact checkers? A ton of the giangs use SPLC, a organization that blatantly ignores left-wing violent groups in their hate maps.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.