Aaand suddently VM-exit latencies on Intel CPUs will go through the roof, oh, and if you're still putting different guests on sibling hyperthreads you're going to get pwned and you know it. Good job, Intel. You saved a few AND gates. Was it worth it? https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/understanding-l1-terminal-fault-aka-foreshadow-what-you-need-know …
-
-
that's not what I mean; it wouldn't even occur to me (before this all was disclosed) that any speculation is security-sensitive. and indeed it didn't occur to me, or to thousands of way more competent researchers that have certainly known how CPUs work since speculation existed
-
But it didn't occur to people... because they weren't working in both fields. The problem isn't speculation, it's speculation + side channels. HT was always dangerous, but the cache side-channels are just something nobody thought through properly.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I just hope that it’ll be possible to disable these “fixes”, because there are environments in which a local attacker is not a plausible threat. But it seems no, this’ll be shoved down our throats, and 2019 will be the first year in which processors get slower instead of faster.
-
think of it as herd immunity
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.