If you want to claim I made a mistake in the calculation, you're going to have to point out the mistake. Just saying "you're wrong" without an explanation just makes *you* look like you have no idea what you're talking about.
-
-
Replying to @marcan42 @hikari_no_yume and
i just told you but your cant understand it because your dont know how bitcoin system works.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @spiroseliot @hikari_no_yume and
I'm sure I don't know how Bitcoin works; I just happened to read the original Bitcoin paper and build a Cell SPE miner 8 years ago. I also got out when it became clear the community had spiraled out of control and the current system was unsustainable.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @marcan42 @hikari_no_yume and
can you understand this? https://blockchain.info/tx/0d74fab8619a380026882f757555307b80af0ee9b8d274b44a3e963ab6c5046b … No Educate yourself first and after that we can talk. A good place to start is here https://lopp.net/bitcoin.html
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @spiroseliot @marcan42 and
that's a bitcoin transaction
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hikari_no_yume @marcan42 and
i really dont have time. You can easily find what i try to say three tweets before... :P I cant answer the same thing to every "supporter" of this non tech guy. What kind of media is this? The blind-tech fest?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @spiroseliot @hikari_no_yume and
If you're trying to argue that the number of transactions per block is variable (I think that's what you're trying to argue? You're doing a terrible job of it) the point is that's is a *maximum* number of minimum-sized transactions, and you can use that to do the calculation.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @marcan42 @spiroseliot and
and that maximum therefore calculates the *minimum* bitcoin energy use if there's less transactions per block, bitcoin is even *less* efficient, so it doesn't really work as a defence
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @hikari_no_yume @spiroseliot and
Maybe he's arguing that a single Bitcoin txn can "count" as many because it has many inputs and/or outputs. Which is still a useless argument, because the more inputs/outputs the larger it is, and the fewer fit in a block. At most a tiny constant improvement over many small txns.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marcan42 @hikari_no_yume and
I gotta say, of all the crap I see on the internet, bitcoin evangelism is one of the things I understand the least Not all cryptocurrency, no, since newer ones could conceivably be better, specifically bitcoin
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @demize95 @hikari_no_yume and
Bitcoin and all the near-identical clones anyway.
5:24 AM - 28 Jun 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.