really? I drastically prefer bytearray. In all fairness my experience with JS dev is limited to exploitation of webkit, meaning I'm probably playing with the absolute nastiest of edge cases, but like... I really like python a lot more? It feels cleaner to me in a lot of ways
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @hedgeberg @scanlime
of course, I'm not exactly a huge python or js dev so my opinion is kinda moot on this, I use js for bad things and python for gross terribly structured scripts and I prefer to write everything in regular C so if anything I'm Objectively Wrong (tm)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @hedgeberg @scanlime
Eh, I agree, Python is a much better thought-out language, especially since they (after all these years) managed to pull off a backwards-compat breaking release (Py3) while JS is stuck with all of its warts forever. UTF-16, really? No integer types? sort() sorts in string order?
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
The one thing JS has going for it is it's huge since it happens to be the language of the web, which means lots of time goes into optimizing the hell out of it, which means these days it's fast (but only thanks to ridiculously complex, massive, incomprehensible JIT engines).
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
But, like, that happened *despite* JS being a terrible language. It's a consequence of its popularity; JS isn't popular because it's a good language, it's popular because it happened to wind up being *the* language of the web (and people are trying to use it for other things).
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @marcan42 @hedgeberg
thanks for rising to scanlime's challenge, I enjoyed this thread and your impassioned defense of py3 compared to the node ecosystem!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Got me blocked though 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.