Seriously, you have *no excuse* for this stuff. The moment you saw "mmc1" you should've looked at sysfs to find out what that is used for, or the device tree to figure out how it's configured. This is just shoddy research. https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/blob/rpi-4.14.y/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts …
-
-
Are machines compromised? Who knows, but I am carefully observant of their behavior and have no reason to believe that they are. But if I *had* a reason, I wouldn't be tweeting mains noise scope traces. Within 24 hours the world would have IDBs of whatever it was if it were real.
-
Because this *is* my field, I've pentested SoCs and embedded devices, I know where you can hide things and where you can't, I know how Flash memory buses work, I have the tools and I know how to use them. And *you* clearly don't.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
"Soft" APTs. Heh. How soft on the Rockwell scale? Yet I've been trying to show some scope traces corroborated by other items, and you insist you know more. I've posted enough stuff for analysis. The rest is left as an exercise for the reader. Maybe I'm wrong, don't think so yet.
-
Not a single person with experience has agreed with your tweets. I'm taking my time to point out your mistakes. Everyone else is rolling their eyes. You've showed me some scope traces of mains/PSU noise. You've pointed out the WiFi SDIO. You've butchered a magjack. What next?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.