Why is everyone raising a fit over *Google* of all companies trying to patent a video compression algorithm? Don't people realize that if *they* can get it then *so can any of the shitstain companies that are members of the H.265 patent pools*? This is a Good Thing.
-
-
Software patents are evil, but we're *stuck* with them, and as long as we are, I damn well hope Google patents as much video compression stuff as they possibly can, for the sake of open, royalty-free, advanced video compression algorithms. H.264/265 and their licensors can DIAF.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
most notably the "Defensive Termination" clause, which means that if they tried to go back on their word and sue anybody over anything in AV1, they'd lose their license to everybody else's patents on it
-
so we don't have to take their word for it, they're _bound_ never to litigate over AV1 patents, as is everybody else who uses it
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
ANS didn't make it into the final AV1 spec, so it's not *required* that Google license that patent (but I hope they do, and it's good to ask for it). And yeah, even Xiph has defensive patents. See also Monty's blog post a year ago when this came up: https://xiphmont.dreamwidth.org/84214.html
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Basically, a lot of legalese to say "use it for whatever UNLESS you sue us back". Better having the patent parked by a relatively trustworthy partner than poached by the H264 consortium.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.