For the record I still think those little posts while perhaps standard, are likely trouble. Sure lets put little antennas on the fanciest signal processing chip in the architecture. Oh and with a convenient signal collector shield they are in the center of.
-
-
Replying to @dragosr
1000BASE-T runs at 125Mbaud (with 4 pairs and 2 bit per symbol encoding = 1Gbps). That's a peak frequency of 62MHz. Guess how much of that signal will be radiated by your 3.87mm antenna, which is a quarter-wave monopole at 19 *G*Hz? And then of course there's a *shield* around it
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Am I right in thinking that the Ethernet pairs are differential, and that's likely to reduce radiation due to destructive interference as well?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @gsuberland @dragosr
Yup. I was going to mention that but I ran out of characters :-)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @marcan42
As an aside, am I also right in thinking that beyond a certain operating frequency differential pairs actually cause constructive interference due to the tiny wavelength? (and while I'm thinking about it... is this how those voodoo microwave PCB trace filters work?)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yeah, stuff like this only works when the geometries involved are << the wavelength AFAIK. Once you get near the wavelength, things get really funky.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.