To elaborate : • STATES exert sovereign control over *territory.* These territories have borders, are recognised by other States (diplomatic missions, treaties, &c.) and are administered by their own bureaucracy. …
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
• NATIONS are socially constructed *communities* informed by language, religion, ethnic identity, &c. So, STATES ≠ NATIONS, and strictly speaking we should probably only use ‘nation-state’ when describing ICT threats from Japan …
Prikaži ovu nit -
YMMV, but my private taxonomy for ‘advanced’ (
) campaigns :
• STATE-OPERATED : e.g., GRU hands on GRU keyboards
• STATE-AFFILIATED : extracurriculars by gov’t units, contractors
• STATE-SPONSORED : gov’t funding to non-affiliates
• STATE-TOLERATED : crime anywhere but herePrikaži ovu nit -
**RT pls** re : taxonomy
, assuming we want to level up from mangling int’l relations terms & get a bit of refinement in the guv’mint noun group...
Would you consider using STATE-SPECTRUM [actors|campaigns|espionage|hacking|malware|threats] as a replacement for NATION-STATE?Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.