manwhohasitall

not a lot of people know, but Mark Twain was actually a man

I think that's been debunked though. How could that wonderful writing be done by a man?

I know, it doesn't make a lot of sense. I think a lot of people just wish it was true.

That must be it. Because we all know men don't have the capacity to write like that....it's not in their inborn nature, bless the darlings.

It's just biology; men are fine at some things, like lifting heavy objects. But they're not good at everything, like women are.

And they're so unstable. With all those mood swings, how can they concentrate on intellectual pursuits?

True, look how 'hysterical' they get watching sport - you wouldn't want to trust nuclear codes with them.

Whenever a man gets overemotional I have to ask "oh honey, is it that time of the season?"

You could invent a caveman. Call him Ugh or something, and claim he invented something. Maybe the first man to wear makeup.

That's controversial though. I mean, there's no actual proof that men existed in the Stone Age, is there?

As an archaeologist I can confirm that there were men in the Stone Age, even though we say cavewomen. Women did all the artwork though.

You don't think there's anything in the theory that men might have carved some of the male figurines of the time?

I think it is pretty obvious from the female gaze of the sculptors that those figurines were just porn. Primitive times, of course.

I suppose you're right. Why else would anyone make figurines of men?

Some of the figurines were fertility figures. The Roman god, Priapus, was worshipped by insecure & impotent men hoping to achieve erection.

There are so many phalluses on Roman material culture. It just proves that men's only purpose was and is procreation.

1. Why are u rubbishing existing knowledge? How dare u? 2. Nice idea; not priority. 3. Didn't they just start wars? Anything constructive?

What we historians really ought to do is understand the causes of economic growth & falling income inequality. This is a distraction.

I think you'll find that men DO feature in history books. Sure, it's not 50%. But that reflects REALITY. They had a marginal role.

Also, isn't there already a special month for men's history? We shouldn't have to pretend to care about it the rest of the time too!

That's an ace gif.

I'm so tired of identify politics. I care about the person's contribution, not her gender. This divisive rhetoric is destroying progessivism