Circumcision “researchers” aren’t looking for a cure to a disease. While in any other case, science is meant to outdate itself, make itself obsolete, #circumcision “research” seeks to make a contested, ancient ritual permanent and indispensable. In short, it’s pseudoscience. #i2
“The ongoing quest to vindicate circumcision is pseudoscience.” What are you even talking about? If researchers find that the ACTUAL statuses of circumcised people isn’t damage or harm & many don’t feel violated, researchers aren’t making that up. What are you talking about?
-
-
The actual status is undeniable damage and harm: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21672947 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17155977 http://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/2017/08/msoc2-1708.html … Any researcher concluding that "circumcision is harmless" is not doing their job correctly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.