Circumcision “researchers” aren’t looking for a cure to a disease. While in any other case, science is meant to outdate itself, make itself obsolete, #circumcision “research” seeks to make a contested, ancient ritual permanent and indispensable. In short, it’s pseudoscience. #i2
Lastly, it’s not just researchers, African women are actually SAYING we’re not negatively impacted by circumcision, and we know OUR bodies better than anyone. Just look at our cover photo/videos of women who reject the label “FGM.” Again, you’re choosing to deny facts/reality.
-
-
-
My argument is that, for the pro-human rights side is, it is a mistake to make the argument about how much people can still enjoy sex; even if it improved it, our contention is that forcibly cutting is a violation of basic human rights.
#i2 -
What you’re doing is promoting a universal/uniform reality. There are no universal results from circ surgeries and research SHOWS that diversity whether you accept it or not. NOT everyone is mutilated, violated or believes cutting genitals is ANY DIFFERENT from ears, etc. Bye!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It’s inconsistent to excuse male
#circumcision on the grounds that “circumcised men can still enjoy sex and experience orgasm,” and oppose#FGM on the false grounds that it “eliminates a woman’s ability to orgasm,” when this demonstrably not true.#i2 -
At least for me, how much a person can still orgasm after forced genital cutting is irrelevant. Women can enjoy sex after rape; rape would still be a horrific violation of her basic human rights. This has nothing to do with post-cut sexual enjoyment; it’s about human rights.
#i2
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.