What's better: allowing people to die from preventable diseases to allow us to evolve beyond susceptibility to them Or Preventing them and counting on technological means to be constantly available to artificially prevent them?
This happens because these types of consequences are built into the nature of Humanity under technocapital, it's intensified at a rate our evolution couldn't match. Better people arguably get less of this.
-
-
I've approached this problem with likely the same disgust as you, however I see no way to detach while other lesser Nations continue.. We should strive to achieve absolute technological dominance and then subject others to it while respecting our environment
-
It's a tall order
-
Yes, yes it is. Should we fail or quit the consequences are catastrophic for both us and the planet
-
It's probably going to be catastrophic no matter what.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.