Many that share your orientation have this opinion also. Baudrillard and deluze and guttari both come out of the Marxist tradition. Why does it matter who makes the suggestion? It seems immature to me to disregard potential informative material based on the person offering it.
-
-
No you misunderstand through your own arrogant presumption that Marxist-Leninists are unfamiliar with the dilettantes you invoke as Priestly Authorities.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
If they are familiar, then it's even more of an indictment as woke capital rages on DSA morons in tow. They wouldn't even let you say transsexuals are different than women. They can't even say the revolution needs able bodies.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
No idea who you're invoking, but we have no relations with "they" or any DSA cretins and we assert very loudly that transwomen are not women.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I understand you are not them. If they were like you, they would be far, far less bamboozled by the bad faith pied Piper of woke capital. It just so happens that they are the popular socialist movement in the West.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
They're not popular at all, you put too much value in bourgeois media/spectacle & the noisy 'middle classes', (who will fall silent when the situation is really revolutionary).
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This may be true, if so it's an illustrative example of the type of cybernetic context creation that is happening now digitally and via other media thats represents novel threat for any revolutionary. There's never been a more effective reality setting mechanism.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Its just more sophisticated, 'engaging/interactive' teevee. But like that & the print press, and many other forms of bourgeois technology: its real power lies in the masses, and not the controlling minority or the tech itself.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I think the tech is definitely a critical vulnerability and has some inherent issues like unforseen consequences, especially when it's very advanced. Something like crispr or experimentation with viruses for example.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
There are certain risks involved in the production of all new mediciines for eg, shall we stop researching new medicine then? That would be absurd, no, what we must do is take control of such research, prize it from the hands of definite exploiter classes.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Most of the useful medicines are avaliable without the current industrial system, it's a sad irony that the novel modern diseases and higher incidences are a product of the consequences of the same system that produces the medicine.
-
-
Nonsense, how will medicine be sustainably manufactured & distributed to billions of people across any territory &/or seas without industrial means, carrier pigoens?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.