You must spend a lot of time on 4chan yourself to be able to make such valuation, what makes this argument valid at all? I too can pull a blanket rejection out my nethers for your position as well. You see how dishonest and fruitless it is?
-
-
Replying to @NoLoveDeepState @VastarienClub and
Phil Greaves Retweeted Phil Greaves
I haven't posited a particular "position" for you to reject, other than a dismissal of your general grandiose "theorising", (as you are void of any practical example, ofc)...https://twitter.com/PhilGreaves01/status/863686695300063232 …
Phil Greaves added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilGreaves01 @VastarienClub and
How do thousands of years worth of pre-industrial civilization constitute a lack of a practical example for our "theorising", Phil? What about currently-existing low-tech communes? Your dismissal is just that, a refusal to discuss anything outside of your own field of views.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NoLoveDeepState @VastarienClub and
Pfft, they are not practical examples of taking humanity forward in the actual circumstances of today, rather taking it backward through untold pain & misery all to the ultimate petty bourgeois fantasy: the house on the prairie.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PhilGreaves01 @VastarienClub and
Nice broad misrepresentation of our discourse... For humanity, the only thing in the "forward" direction is a precipice & 170 years of Marxism have done nothing but intermitently put an extra foot on the pedal. The left stands today impotent clutching pearls and chanting mantras
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NoLoveDeepState @VastarienClub and
Poor attempt at a mighty mantra in itself, but just a sad reflection of the weltchmerzy petty booj who sees nothing in the great strides humanity has taken against reaction, both before & such struggles were theorized & developed through Marxism.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilGreaves01 @VastarienClub and
One step forward and two steps back ,Phil, time is running out for a biosphere that can sustain human life, 7 billion souls are on the line anyway, the revolution isn't comming soon enough, do you realize this?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NoLoveDeepState @VastarienClub and
The revolution is all around us, tho not so much in the parasitic core ofc, but "the point is to change it", and not simply run into the woods searching for the house on the prairie.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PhilGreaves01 @NoLoveDeepState and
Our preference would be revolutionary destruction of the technological system, the off grid praxis is just the other prong. We don't have the lineage that ML does and we're newer. Given the ecologically defined time table, revolutionary success is unlikely.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @maldngflgh @NoLoveDeepState and
There is no linear "technological system" to destroy, you destroy one part the still existing capitalist class & production process will just rebuild it around another. You're basically calling for Nuclear Armageddon.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
There is, it's been outlined in detail. It's interconnectivity over distance and reliance on its own momentum is it's weakness. If it goes to a sufficient degree the probability of resurgence is functionally zero.pic.twitter.com/fCgKsnciO5
-
-
Replying to @maldngflgh @NoLoveDeepState and
Its just boring honestly, all this is a crude rehash of what went on in england at the onset of the industrial revolution. Smash the machines, go for it, you'll still be exploited & enslaved & the capitalists will still destroy the planet with you still stuck on it.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.