Is it boug to want sustainable fuels for tanks?
-
-
They're not popular at all, you put too much value in bourgeois media/spectacle & the noisy 'middle classes', (who will fall silent when the situation is really revolutionary).
-
This may be true, if so it's an illustrative example of the type of cybernetic context creation that is happening now digitally and via other media thats represents novel threat for any revolutionary. There's never been a more effective reality setting mechanism.
-
Its just more sophisticated, 'engaging/interactive' teevee. But like that & the print press, and many other forms of bourgeois technology: its real power lies in the masses, and not the controlling minority or the tech itself.
-
I think the tech is definitely a critical vulnerability and has some inherent issues like unforseen consequences, especially when it's very advanced. Something like crispr or experimentation with viruses for example.
-
There are certain risks involved in the production of all new mediciines for eg, shall we stop researching new medicine then? That would be absurd, no, what we must do is take control of such research, prize it from the hands of definite exploiter classes.
-
Most of the useful medicines are avaliable without the current industrial system, it's a sad irony that the novel modern diseases and higher incidences are a product of the consequences of the same system that produces the medicine.
-
Nonsense, how will medicine be sustainably manufactured & distributed to billions of people across any territory &/or seas without industrial means, carrier pigoens?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.