This type of thing opens the door that makes it all sound more and more utilitarian or virtue ethicsy as you push it with further hypotheticals
-
-
Replying to @maldngflgh
well the question is whether one's conscience is more valuable than the safety of another or their life. To preserve the comfort of your own conscience while causing another to suffer? What can we call that other than narcissistic vanity?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GolfNorman
I mean I agree but I'm a virtue ethicist if I'm any of the big three.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @maldngflgh
returning to the categorical imperative, one must weigh the consequence if all men engaged in the practice and what it's effect would be. And if every man told a lie to protect his family it would have no net evil effect on the world and this proof is easy.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
you are literally, theologically, and completely wrong here.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
"from physical harm or mortal peril" dumbass
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
My family starved to death while I was trying to think through the categorical imperative
-
-
I bet my FOOT would FIT in your BOY HOLE
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.