It’s been more than a week since Stallman resigned from the @FSF. The organization has still not communicated even _vague_ plans for moving forward.
#cancelstallman means not just removing him from power. It means rethinking what the org he created is for - & who it serves.
-
Show this thread
-
The
@FSF board is clearly complicit and clearly in conflict of (public) interest. FSF claims to be free for everyone, not just Stallman. The FSF board should either support the public users and members of the FSF or step down. If the organization bylaws do not allow for1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
review or audit (external, preferably!), then the bylaws are complicit too. FSF members with a conscience may want to consider abandoning the organization for one that more closely mirrors their own ideals, or of course it's fair play to try to "make change from within" but
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
they should realize that the odds are against them. It's difficult, but possible. It's harder when the board is stonewalling and caping for the deposed founder, though.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.