It is hard to read that : - (full) redaction would not stand by one of its own for a simple link toward of a known story - a reporter could not assess the anger she would trigger by doing so in a mourning period - however talented he was at his work, so many people will considerhttps://twitter.com/MiriamElder/status/1221892061139480579 …
in showbiz & press (she has been a victim, important in context) which supports my opinion that as important as it has been, this movement has been overwhelmingly represented in those fields. Either they are way too many sick people (the attackers *and* the ones not listening
-
-
all these years) in these fields or, them being in average more public & wealthy public makes it easier to make a case a news, whereas a nobody being attacked will be more likely to be "not good/rich enough" for a case or mediatisation. All this is wrong on so many levels.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.