Constituent services taken to a whole new level, apparently =>https://twitter.com/Castro4Congress/status/1158576680182718464 …
Don't want to RT this because I don't want to put these people's names in my feed but this is dangerous, by any campaign.
-
-
I labored over this for the same reason. But I think it was important to highlight, ultimately.
-
What am I missing? This is public information via the FEC. Also, the NYT has done these stories disclosing donors to presidential candidates, like this one: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/projects/clinton-donors …
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
This is public information and I think you're confusing Joaquin for Julián; which is pretty embarrassing for a few reasons.
-
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
Dangerous? I Googled one name (William Greehey) and found this in one click: https://www.eenews.net/stories/1060758685 … ("William Greehey, chairman of the board of NuStar Energy LP and former CEO of Valero Energy Corp., gave $35,000 to the joint committee and $5,600 to the campaign.")
Dziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
-
-
Dangerous? This is public information published by the FEC—information you and your colleagues have used for countless stories over the years.
-
I don't think anyone questioned that it's FEC data. You think that tweet mirrors how news stories are done on FEC data/donors?
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
Don't you regularly disclose the donors' names in articles on fundraising? I understand disclosure comes with some risk but not sure I see the distinction. It's public info for reason: to hold candidates/electeds/donors accountable for positions.
-
I think it's because of the political climate on Twitter...sharing names with a call to action (on either side) can lead to doxxing (release of phone numbers and addresses). That's why it's potentially dangerous.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
This is San Antonio, on the cutting edge of one of the most volatile issues of the campaign. If you're financing a clearly racist candidate, who's done his best to inflame that very issue, through a system that you know will be public information, you takes your chances.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.