I scanned it. It looks like they are buying and selling options. If you can get a spread there, then I get that. I also saw reference to buying puts. Big difference between buying puts and buying calls.
-
-
To an option trader, puts and calls are the same thing. Why do you think that is?
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Then why is there a volatility smirk if you treat them the same?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
They're not identical (if different strikes). But if upside calls are overpriced, more than likely downside puts are too.
@KrisAbdelmessih has some good blog posts on the vol smile & implied distributions.@SinclairEuan has a paper showing puts more expensive than calls generally1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @be20684347 @breakingthemark and
Matt, just to confirm put call parity is just on a single strike like was said above (if you find different vols on the same strike, which is common bc of financing assumptions or market width, you generally want to use the vol from the OTM option because it's tighter)
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @KrisAbdelmessih @be20684347 and
Right, and I was saying the market doesn't treat puts and call the same because a put one standard deviation OTM could be twice the price of a call one standard deviation OTM.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @breakingthemark @be20684347 and
Yea totally. A volatility smile exists for plenty of reasons. There's a cap structure argument for it but I find the most useful reason --the world is net long. It's a one sided market of hedgers that clears at a price where risk capital is willing to supply liquidity
1 reply 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @KrisAbdelmessih @breakingthemark and
Convex negative dependency on global risk is: - an attractive asset - an unattractive liability Buyers happy to pay up for it Sellers demand more to take it on
2 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @therobotjames @KrisAbdelmessih and
yes, and least for the overall market, isn't thats why the vol premium exists and why calls must generally be "overpriced". Since the world is generally long stocks, puts are bid up much high than "fair value" and because of put/call parity calls must be more expensive too.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @breakingthemark @therobotjames and
Whole argument seems weird to me because surely the most important thing is the portfolio effect? Selling options in isolation is net +EV over time if done in small enough size. But for many people it would be +EV for them to be net long options because the value of
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes
additional capital in really bad times is so huge. That’s why there’s a market! Same reason why buying futures can be +EV for speculators and selling futures can be +EV for hedgers — it just requires the concept of “EV” to take more into account than the PnL of a single trade.
-
-
Replying to @macrocephalopod @breakingthemark and
Totally. In fact when I'm getting hit or lifted on something my first thought is what are they seeing that makes trading on my offer a good idea. A sophisticated player usually doesn't know which trade is the winner, but they do what they think works for the portfolio
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @KrisAbdelmessih @macrocephalopod and
One of the posts that I feel should be markets 101https://moontowermeta.com/you-dont-see-the-whole-picture/ …
0 replies 0 retweets 9 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.