I get this question a lot in DMs so putting it here so I can refer to it later. "Why do put options and call options at the same strike have different implied volatilities (attaches screenshot of broker GUI)?"
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @bennpeifert
Is it possible they’re sometimes not equal because they are American, and there’s some kind of dividend and/or borrow thing going on? I try not to think about American options so I may be completely off, but this at least sounds plausible.
7 replies 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod
i think u got lazy and didnt read the thread ;)
2 replies 0 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @bennpeifert
Ah I read it but what I understood was “the IVs are wrong because your broker has crappy input data and doesn’t care” but I think what you meant was “the IVs are wrong because the options are American and there are dividend/borrow effects, and your broker uses BS naively”
6 replies 0 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod @bennpeifert
https://quant.stackexchange.com/questions/7604/does-implied-vol-vary-for-calls-vs-puts/7616#7616 … It’s skew
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @bennpeifert @macrocephalopod
You have failed to consider that the b/o can be huge for specific options types. I.e. puts can have a higher b/o vol spread
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
what does bid/offer spread even matter here? this is basic put-call parity, there could be zero bid, but why would your order even fill in this case?
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @nope_its_lily @TerribleQuant and
if you can't fill it it's not an arbitrage lmfao
3 replies 0 retweets 11 likes
Don’t feed it lily.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

