i think u got lazy and didnt read the thread ;)
-
-
Replying to @bennpeifert
Ah I read it but what I understood was “the IVs are wrong because your broker has crappy input data and doesn’t care” but I think what you meant was “the IVs are wrong because the options are American and there are dividend/borrow effects, and your broker uses BS naively”
6 replies 0 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod @bennpeifert
https://quant.stackexchange.com/questions/7604/does-implied-vol-vary-for-calls-vs-puts/7616#7616 … It’s skew
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @bennpeifert @macrocephalopod
You have failed to consider that the b/o can be huge for specific options types. I.e. puts can have a higher b/o vol spread
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TerribleQuant @macrocephalopod
you evidently don't know what a volatility surface even is and you're replying to me with "you have failed to consider"
3 replies 0 retweets 15 likes -
Back in my day, real quants with real degrees(not fake bs econ degrees.) would not deflect.
3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
deflect what?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bennpeifert @MikeJohn46920 and
he's just having a little fun i assume? you know, being that skew is difference in vols at different strikes, and all...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Back In my days, I would not need to explain to faux quants with fake science degrees.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
uh @bennpeifert I think “voltwit troll guy” is now a type of guypic.twitter.com/foUw9Nfws2
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

