Unbelievable, this seems rife for abuse. [save to bookmarks]
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Technically you can get loads more data with overlapping intervals. Adjusting hypothesis tests for the autocorrelation structure is a bit of a mess. (not impossible though). Most people would never do this and conclude things entireyl wrongly.
-
If you only have the overlapping intervals that’s true for some use cases. But if you have the sub-periods too then the overlapping intervals can’t buy you any more power (for obvious info theory reasons).
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Always fun to see “analysis” that looks at rolling monthly yoy instead of the monthly change and gets an r^2 about 3x overstated as a result

-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
1/2 Hmm I get that intuitively the overlap means that not all samples are independent so true variance should be higher than sample variance (and thus t-stat lower), but it also intuitively feels like completely disjoint subperiods throws away info.
-
2/2 For vol estimation, the Hodges and Tompkins correction can be used to correct this bias (the bias in the variance of vol). Do you know if there's a similar method for general regressions?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
this is an awesome point. once the number of data pts shrinks, the uncertainty of the observed effect rises. what's your fav way to quantify that? sorry if dumb
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Are you hinting abit to the 10Y equity return scatter charts (vs I.e P/E) ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
newey west has entered the chat
-
Wait, why Newey West?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.