Why are big macro names so allergic to being long equities? “Oh no no no. We are serious people here, sir. We do ‘sophisticated’ trading here.”
-
-
Replying to @MarkGutman9
Investor preference. Big institutions don’t want their macro managers to be slinging directional beta in stocks, esp not if they are paying 2/20 for net long exposure that they can get for <20 bps elsewhere.
4 replies 0 retweets 35 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod
Yes. I get that. But the macro PM job should be to identify the good trades. If it’s stocks, then it’s stocks. But I know i’m an idealist
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
Replying to @MarkGutman9
Big part of it is that allocators simply do not believe that many funds can time equities. A few big names get a pass eg Element, everyone else needs to think about keeping their investors onside. Is it ideal? No, but it’s part of the game.
1:11 AM - 7 Nov 2021
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.