Question for quant/algo people. I believe human traders must develop a view of the market, then seek out the best implementation strategy to express it. Do any machine strategies do this, or do they tend to operate/evaluate starting directly at the instrument/product level?
-
-
Replying to @TCK_JRubano
You can do top down or bottom up in quant, although it’s more common to do bottom up.
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod @TCK_JRubano
For an example of top-down quant, AHL trade equity sectors using a technical strategy, then use a combination of technical/fundamental metrics to decide which companies to long/short to get exposure to the sector.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod
Would I be correct in assuming that a top-down implementation is a much more complicated and involved undertaking?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TCK_JRubano
I don’t think it’s any more or less complicated. In top down, you can easily figure out your gross portfolio exposures (eg how much equity beta, how much dv01 etc) and the hard part is selecting securities to give you that exposure. In bottom down, selecting securities is …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @macrocephalopod @TCK_JRubano
straightforward but you also need to respect your portfolio risk constraints, generally your positions can’t be treated as independent of each other, and that’s where it gets complicated.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
If you took a pure bottom up approach and just used whatever gross exposures came out of the security selection, then yes bottom-up would be easier. But I wouldn’t recommend doing that.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.